whitesandstreatment.com

HomeOpinionOpinionA European worldview forced onto a South African reality

A European worldview forced onto a South African reality

 
norwayworldview

Two cases getting media attention in Norway: Left, Christian parents whose children have been taken away from them by the state, and (inset, right) a right wing mass murderer.

Michael Swain, Executive Director of FOR SA draws on current events in Norway to show how a legally-entrenched secular humanist worldview affects citizens. South Africans should be concerned about moves to start entrenching this foreign worldview into laws that will radically impact the lives of ordinary people, he warns.

The worldview that society holds will fundamentally impact the lives and rights of every individual in that society since it will inevitably have a logical outworking in the laws and values of that society. This has recently been highlighted in the application of the secular humanist worldview that undergirds the Norwegian state. When you hold the view (as they do) that man is inherently good and that if he does something antisocial it is therefore not his fault but the result of negative experiences that he has been subjected to, it is logical that they would have a liberal political and legal system that treats prisoners as human beings in need of rehabilitation so that they can re-enter society.

Cold coffee
The appeal of Anders Breivik, a Norwegian convicted of murdering 77 people in twin attacks on July 22, 2011 when he bombed the government’s headquarters in Oslo, killing 8 people, and then gunned down 69 more at a Labour Party summer youth camp, is a prime example. Breivik took the Norwegian State to court this year, complaining that he was subjected to “serious torture” while imprisoned. He listed, among other things, his lack of access to adult video games, his coffee being served cold and not being provided with enough moisturiser for his skin.

The Norwegian government is willing to entertain this complaint and to publicly justify their treatment of Breivik, who enjoys a 3-room prison cell (with an area for sleeping, an area for studying and an area for working out) and who can run on a treadmill, watch DVDs, play games on a Sony PlayStation and take distance-learning courses at the university. The words of Ina Stromstad, a spokeswoman for the Olso district court, perfectly sum up this worldview manifestation: “He is a citizen of Norway and even though he is convicted for a horrible crime, he hasn’t lost his human rights”. The fact that there is little or no sense of justice for those who lost family and loved ones in this senseless attack appears to be an irrelevant or secondary consideration.

Belief that children are good
This secular humanist worldview equally informs the Norwegian government’s policy on the discipline of children, which bans even the mildest form of physical discipline. Because this worldview sees all children as good, if a parent then disciplines a child, this is inherently wrong – especially if any form of physical correction is used. Any such behaviour by a parent is viewed as aberrant and likely to cause the child to subsequently manifest antisocial tendencies. As a consequence, when such a case is discovered or reported, the child must be removed forthwith and custody retained by the State in the best interests of the child. The fact that the parent/child relationship is severed and fundamentally damaged in the process, is irrelevant.

A current case highlights this, where a Romanian family in Norway had their five children (including a small baby) taken from their home and split between three different sets of foster parents, because the State did not agree with the children’s Christian upbringing (including occasional, non-injurious spanking for purposes of discipline). The parents were forbidden, for several months, from seeing or even communicating with their children. This case has elicited widespread protests across Europe and many believe that the parents are the victims of religious discrimination, particularly because they are Pentecostal Christians. Although the Norwegian authorities have subsequently returned the baby to the family, the other children remain in foster care and the State has indicated that it will apply for an order to permanently remove the children. (To read more about this case, see http://www.christianconcern.com/our-concerns/family/50-rallies-take-place-for-christian-parents-in-norway-who-had-children-removed).

By contrast, in South Africa the vast majority of people do not hold to a secular humanist worldview, but are adherents of the Christian faith. As such, the vast majority of people in South Africa believe that the State does not have the right to interfere with their God-given responsibility to raise their children in accordance with the guidance of Scripture. A biblical Christian worldview begins with the acknowledgement that man is an inherently fallen creature and his nature is predisposed to act in a self-serving, self-seeking way that will inevitably be to the detriment of himself and others. In the case of children, the Bible teaches that “folly is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of discipline will drive it far away” (Proverbs 22:15). While this and other related Scriptures may be interpreted in a number of ways, it places the responsibility to bring correction to their child’s behavior squarely on the shoulders of the parents. This responsibility is also a reflection of how God treats us as His beloved children and He provides the perfect model in the exercise of parental discipline. For “our fathers disciplined us for a little while as they thought best; but God disciplines us for our good, that we may share in his holiness. No discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and peace for those who have been trained by it.” (Hebrews 12:10, 11). If God takes such trouble in the discipline and training of His children, earthly parents should strive to do the same – for the good of their children!

Proposed amendment to Children’s Act
Given the vastly different worldview of the majority of South Africans, it is deeply concerning that the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), and indeed our Department of Social Development (DSD), are taking a similar view to the Norwegian government and proposing amendments to the Children’s Act that will have the effect of criminalising all spanking in the home. In the case of Mostert v Joshua Generation Church, the SAHRC recently found that there is no difference between “disciplinary spanking” (a physically non-injurious act, motivated by love and concern, and intending to educate and correct), and “abuse” or “violence” (physical assault, motivated by anger and malice, intending to injure or abuse, and in fact causing injury). Common sense clearly dictates otherwise, but assuming that this becomes law, then there will be penalties if parents are found guilty of the “crime” of spanking. These may include the parent being prosecuted for assault; an order removing the child from the parent and placing him/her in alternative care; and/or an order that the parent be trained in “non-violent parenting” (otherwise known as “sensitisation training”). (In this regard, see FOR SA’s recent article in Gateway News – http://gatewaynews.co.za/church-appeals-sahrcs-report-on-spanking-in-the-home/)

Not only is our worldview completely different, but the cultural and economic reality in South Africa is completely different to that of Norway. The alternative disciplinary methods proposed by the SAHRC and DSD, assume a middle-class society where all children have “time-out” rooms or toys that can be taken away from them, as a means of enforcing discipline. That is simply not the reality for the vast majority of people in South Africa. A legal ban on spanking will disempower parents in disadvantaged communities and the consequence will be that their children will grow up without a proper understanding of the consequences of antisocial behavior. The saying goes “If parents fail to discipline their children in the home with love, society will discipline them as adults without love”. South Africa already faces a crime crisis and we simply cannot afford to add to this in the name of political correctness.

Freedom of Religion South Africa (FOR SA) is committed to ensure that every South African has the opportunity to defend their freedom of conscience and the right to choose what to believe and how to express and live out their beliefs. This includes the rights of parents to interpret the injunctions of the Bible and/or other holy texts on raising their children. FOR SA is equally committed to resist attempts by the State to undermine and limit the freedom of religion that the South African Constitution guarantees, which includes the right to preach and teach Biblical truth and precepts which we believe can only result in a just, free and prosperous South Africa for all her citizens.

Support FOR SA
You can join this struggle and help FOR SA protect your freedom by:

– Signing up (at no cost) to FOR SA, at www.forsa.org.za
– Following us on Facebook at “Freedom of Religion SA”
– Making a financial contribution to FOR SA.

As a non-profit organisation, we are entirely dependent upon God’s grace for finances. Your generosity will help make a significant difference as we work to fulfil our God-given mission to keep the doors open for the Gospel by advocating for religious freedom. We appreciate every gift, big or small!

Our bank details are:

Account name: FOR SA
Bank: ABSA
Account #: 4062114352
Branch code: 632005

 
 

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO MAKE/VIEW COMMENTS


ADVERTISEMENTS:
Maths Matters
Party Stuff
Accommodation Directory
Puppy Classes



COMMENTING GUIDELINES:

You are welcome to make comments that add value to the article above and to engage in thoughtful, constructive discussion with fellow readers. Comments that contain vulgar language will be removed. Hostile, demeaning, disrespectful, propagandistic comments may also be moved. This is a Christian website and if you wish to vent against Christian beliefs you have probably come to the wrong place and your comments may be removed. Ongoing debates and repetitiveness will not be tolerated.
 

5 Comments

  1. Adriaan Mostert says:

    What a lot of nonsense. Anyone can read the proposed Child Act Amended to see you are, in essence, a little sparce on the truth.

    Cheap scare tactics to scare only the uninformed. Shame on you for capitlizing on ignorance. Oh wait…

    Are you really saying that because South Africa do not have a large ‘middle class’, parents are justified to resort to hitting children”? Really?

  2. Graham Ries says:

    Satan will stop at absolutely NOTHING to break up families and homes – eagerly resorting to twisting the truth and creating a world full of idiots who actually THINK they are doing the right thing, whilst in reality destroying everything good there is. I actively support Michael Swain for FOR SA. I wish I could afford to support you financially as well…

  3. Peter Mc Gregor says:

    Thank you to Michael Swain for an excellent article. South Africa is at a cusp of either moving on for the better with entrenched Christian values or falling into a pit of hell designed by the enemy Satan and his cohorts.I am gratified to see that many, many South Africans are standing up for Christian values, yet there are many more that are oblivious to the reality of what is happening in this country as it seeks to follow a worldly set of values; ignoring the commandments of the creator of this universe.
    What is happening in Norway,could, if unchecked, easily take place here and it is indicative of the senseless thinking in European leadership that has enabled swarms of refugees to cause havoc in many of those countries, including Norway.

  4. Hugh G Wetmore says:

    Anyone with a long-term perspective will agree that children (and adults) were much more free 60 years ago: they could walk safely to school, they played without supervision in parks, and there were few kidnappings, child abuse crimes. That the was also the era of spankings at home and canings at school. Now all physical discipline is banned, and crime has increased exponentially. Of course there are many other factors, but this is certainly a relevant factor. Except for his final anti-refugee paragraph (which would probably have sent those parents back to Romania), Swain is correct. Note also that traditional African culture endorses spanking naughty children. So it’s not only a Christian thing. It’s a normal parenting instinct/practice. Adriaan’s “scare tactics” accusation is uncalled for. We should be scared of where a humanist trend, starting innocently small, can lead to.