whitesandstreatment.com

HomeNewsSouth AfricaCourt asked to clarify judgment against Dutch Reformed Church

Court asked to clarify judgment against Dutch Reformed Church

 

Pretoria High Court.

The Alliance Defending the Autonomy of Churches in South Africa (ADACSA), who appeared as a Friend of the Court in the case of Gaum versus General Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church, has filed an application with the Pretoria High Court to obtain clarity from the judges regarding their recent judgment against the church.

According to ADACSA, it is not clear whether the church’s 2016 decision pertaining to same-sex relationships was set aside only on procedural grounds, or also because the court found the decision to be in violation of the right to equality and other constitutional rights.

As a result of the ambiguity, ADACSA says it is not in a position to advise the denominations, churches and other organisations making up the alliance, whether or not they should apply for leave to appeal the judgment – particularly in circumstances where the DRC has now decided not to appeal.

In their court papers, ADACSA refers to a news article by Prof Pierre de Vos, professor in constitutional law at the University of Cape Town, wherein he expresses uncertainty regarding the true intention and effect of the judgment on other churches and religious organisations. In particular, he expressed the opinion that the part of the judgment relating to the constitutional issues, “may be obiter dictum (an opinion expressed in a written judgment, but not essential to the decision and therefore not binding on other courts)”.

According to Michael Swain, Executive Director of Freedom of Religion South Africa (FOR SA): “It is important to clarify if the court’s statements regarding the constitutionality of the church’s decision form part of the court’s rationale for setting the 2016 decision aside, or whether they were intended as opinion statements only. If they do form part of the rationale for the judgment, this would make substantial inroads on the autonomy of religious organisations to set their own doctrine. This, in turn, sets a dangerous precedent, which is a cause for great concern and may well have to be appealed.”

 
 

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO MAKE/VIEW COMMENTS


ADVERTISEMENTS:
Maths Matters
Party Stuff
Accommodation Directory
Puppy Classes



COMMENTING GUIDELINES:

You are welcome to make comments that add value to the article above and to engage in thoughtful, constructive discussion with fellow readers. Comments that contain vulgar language will be removed. Hostile, demeaning, disrespectful, propagandistic comments may also be moved. This is a Christian website and if you wish to vent against Christian beliefs you have probably come to the wrong place and your comments may be removed. Ongoing debates and repetitiveness will not be tolerated.