JASA takes battle against legalisation of sex between children to Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court.
Constitutional Court.
School principals say their jobs will be a nightmare if they cannot tell children that sex is against the law

A controversial High Court decision to decriminalise sexual activity between adolescent children will be challenged in the Constitutional Court this week.

The Christian-based Justice Alliance of South Africa (JASA) which is taking the battle to the Constitutional Court on Thursday (May 30), says  it will strenuously oppose the abolition of laws against penetrative sex between adolescent children.

Judge Pierre Rabie of the Pretoria High Court ruled on January 15 that it is no longer a criminal offence for children aged between 12 and 16 to engage in consensual sexual activities with each other. The ruling still has to be confirmed by the Constitutional Court.

Click banner for more info

“While supporting the need for changes in the law in respect of petting, cuddling and kissing, JASA will urge the Constitutional Court not to strike down the law prohibiting penetrative sex between consenting children under 16,” the alliance says in a media statement released yesterday.

Wealth of evidence
JASA says it will present a wealth of evidence from eminent medical practitioners and a well known sexologist, and horrifying government statistics relating to schoolgirl pregnancies and abortions, in support of the case that impetuous teenagers under 16 are not equipped to assess the risks of penetrative sex. The Court will also have before it in the form of an affidavit a ‘petition’ from some 40 Western Cape school principals saying that their job will become a nightmare if they are not able to tell adolescent children that sex is against the law.

“The Court will also consider the law in other countries, says JASA, noting that if there were to be no sanctions attached to sexual intercourse for children in South Africa we would certainly become one of the most liberal countries in the world,” says JASA.

“Nobody, of course, least of all JASA, wants children prosecuted, but our excellent system of ‘diversion’ found in the Child Justice Act assures this seldom, if ever, happens. It is simply that a deterrent is vital. The girl needs to be able to say to the boy, ‘No, I am not doing that, and anyway it’s against the law.’

“In seeking to uphold the law against penetrative sex, the radio and TV shows since Judge Rabie’s judgment last year demonstrate that the overwhelming majority of parents in our country want this law retained. Children understand boundaries, and the vast majority want them. And in today’s liberal society, parents need the State’s help in the area of sex, as with drugs and alcohol.

“JASA also maintains that a matter of this nature is preeminently a matter for the elected representatives of the people in Parliament; accordingly one option we will be urging on the Court is that the matter is referred back to Parliament,” says the alliance.

Judge Rabie’s January ruling was welcomed by several child rights organisations, including Childline, on the grounds that the decriminalisation of child sexuality removes children’s fear of seeking guidance from parents, teachers, counsellors and health professionals. However the judge’s decision was opposed by several Christian organisations who say it undermines parental authority and gives a green light to sex between minors.

- Advertisement -


  1. If parents do their God given job it wont be necessary for these things to happen. Shame on you parents.

  2. JASA must be working for Satan.

  3. I am not sure where Mark comes from but his comment is rather irresponsible. JASA is clearly a Christian organisation and therefore opposes Satan. If you think Mark, that they may be misguided, then rather say that. I personally cannot understand how anyone in their right state of mind would want to legalise sex between minors. To all liberalists, stop looking at “rights” and look at the consequences of your misguided beliefs. Rather do something constructive and make sure that responsibilities is also highlighted when pushing for rights.