Church leader, author and television personality Pastor Enoch Phiri tackles the land issue in South Africa. It’s a biblical priority and the Church should be at the forefront of finding solutions, argues the founding pastor of Restoration House in Soweto.
South Africa is at a crossroad yet again. The unfinished business of transition to a democratic nation has caught up with us and we can no longer hide.
The conversations we are having and decisions we are making today have the potential to change the future of our nation for better or worse.
- Advertisement -
It is no longer just the conversations of the ruling elite that matter now, but those of every South African.
This was clearly demonstrated when an individual in Durban expressed her thoughts about holidaymakers in Durban.
What began as Penny Sparrow’s views and perhaps a reflection of conversations she may have been having with her friends, opened a can of worms and has forced the whole nation to face the reality that we have never really dealt with all the issues coming into this new democracy.
- Advertisement -
We got caught up with the euphoria of a new democracy, the international attention we received and we were under the Madiba magic, so we did not pay attention to the details of the agreement that was reached.
It is for that reason I am grateful for the opportunity to be part of this discourse, to share my thoughts around the subject at the heart of tension in the nation — the land and economic transformation subject.
Does South Africa need land redistribution?
South Africa is a beautiful country. This country is well endowed with gold, silver, diamonds and many other minerals.
The land of South Africa is fertile and we have such diverse weather patterns that as a nation we should have food security and also not be lacking in mineral resources.
However, this is not the case as we all know.
The land of South Africa that is endowed with minerals does not unfortunately benefit the majority of the people of the country.
South Africa has amongst the highest income inequality gaps in the world.
Since the dawn of democracy we have seen the country’s economy rise but with very little impact on the lives of the majority of the inhabitants of the land.
The dialogue of land and economic transformation
And we are now at the point where we cannot just hope the situation will resolve itself as the economy grows but it’s time to speak and for all of us to take responsibility to contribute towards this dialogue of land and economic transformation.
Since 1994 we have adopted many policies aimed at addressing the subject of economic transformation.
We started with RDP (Reconstruction and Development Programme), then GEAR (Growth, Employment and Redistribution), and then ASGISA (Accelerated) until we ended up with the National Development Plan and now we are talking Radical Economic Transformation.
All these powerfully-articulated policies failed to archive their intended goals.
While there are many issues surrounding policy implementation, such as lack of capacity, I believe the policies fall short of transforming the economy when aimed at economic transformation that is entirely disconnected to the subject of land.
Why land? — Biblical lessons
I would like to refer to the bible, as we all know it is not just a holy book but the bible is in fact, a historical record of true events of how God dealt with nations on many subjects.
One of the subjects that is clearly close to God’s heart is the subject of land.
Whenever God wanted to free people from bondage He promised them land.
This was the case when He delivered the children of Israel from Egypt which at the time was an economic super power (Exodus).
Whenever God promised to restore a people, He promised them land.
This was the case when the children of Israel were in exile.
He spoke through the words of the prophet Jeremiah when the land had been destroyed and the city of Jerusalem destroyed and said that He would redeem them from captivity and restore the land back to them.
Coveting land given to others
God also warned the children of Israel not to covet the land He had given to other nations.
He set boundaries for the land He was giving to Israel, to ensure they knew clearly what their portion was, and that anything beyond that was pure ambition and perhaps greed.
Everyone was meant to sit under their own vine and fig tree.
What the bible also teaches us is that in His wisdom, God knew that people being people would be led by their ambitions and in dealing with each other, some would lose their lands and become slaves.
Even if the slaves brought it on themselves for whatever reason, God did not intend for anyone to die in a state of slavery and bondage.
He gave laws that every seven years slaves must be released and their debts be written off.
Provision to start afresh
He gave provision for people to start afresh every seven years. But His generosity didn’t end there, He also made provision that those who may have lost or sold their land should be able to recover it at the end of 49 years.
This meant in every generation, each family would be given an opportunity to start again on the land of their forefathers. If parents had lost it because of bad fortunes, the children stood a chance to recover the land and rebuild.
Why would God see fit to put such laws in place? Why would He not want people to rot in jail as we often say?
He reminded the children of Israel of how He took them out of bondage in Egypt.
His compassion and love is with those who are oppressed.
God does not desire to see the people He created rot, because every person is made in His image and He has put treasure in each person and He desires to see people fulfil their purpose.
And He knows that the basic human need of shelter means there must be land upon which this shelter can be built. So to God, land is just a starter pack to life.
What went wrong in Africa?
If we remember the story in Exodus, Moses came to Pharaoh a number of times and Pharaoh refused to let the children of Israel go.
But after he came under pressure when God had confronted him with a number of plagues, he began to agree to let Israel go but he wanted to keep their wealth and their children and therefore grant them only partial freedom.
Many Israelites at that stage were ready to accept any deal from Pharaoh just to get some relief from their hard labour he had put them under. And I believe that is what we did in our country, we accepted partial liberation.
We agreed to leave our wealth and our children behind. And today we have an opportunity to reflect with the benefit of hindsight to come back to the negotiating table, this time to negotiate true liberation.
After World War II when it became clear that the colonial projects in Africa were no longer sustainable and that nations needed to be liberated, the Pharaoh spirit rose up in the colonial nations.
The colonisers began to devise strategies to ensure that Africa would just receive partial liberation.
Negative effects of ignoring land redistribution
In Jeremiah 34:8-22, the children of Israel were now settled in the land and were in charge, however they refused to proclaim liberty to their slaves.
The bible says they were to proclaim freedom but they changed their minds.
When God saw how they changed their minds concerning liberation of the poor, how they came up with new plots to enslave them again, he said: Therefore thus says the Lord: ‘You have not obeyed Me in proclaiming liberty, everyone to his brother and everyone to his neighbour. Behold, I proclaim liberty to you,’ says the Lord — ‘to the sword, to pestilence, and to famine! And I will deliver you to trouble among all the kingdoms of the earth.’
When they refused to grant liberty and restore people, God gave them over the sword, to pestilence and to famine.
This does suggest to us that violence is deeply connected to the subject of restoration.
When people are dispossessed of land and its minerals that are supposed to feed them, violence becomes a norm of society.
So what should be done?
Civil Society represented here and elsewhere must wrestle with the initiative from the politicians in leading the land debate because of the biblical calling about the issue of land.
It is clear that after 23 years of democracy the politicians have failed the people on a matter so crucial, on a matter as deeply spiritual as land.
The failure to resolve this matter also reflects badly on the faith communities and it is clear that we have been found wanting and slumbering, allowing the issue of land to now become the next political football ahead of the next elections.
Neither tthe extreme of rampant and disorderly land occupation, nor the continuation of a land policy that has clearly failed will move our nation forward.
The sudden change of approach by the ANC on the issue of land, while I welcome it, must be approached with caution.
Suddenly there is a willingness to look at a radical approach to the issue of land.
We need to ask ourselves why? The answer seems quite simple to me — once again the hopes of our people are being toyed with — something that we as the faith community have a responsibility to resist.
A national land CODESA
I believe that the nation must pray for a sustainable solution for the resolution of the land question. But we must also do something to bring the nation together in a ‘land CODESA’ to ensure that the resolution of the land question can bring our communities together and not leave them asunder.
Is this even possible? This answer must be found following a thorough national dialogue and soul searching about how the dispossession of land must be reversed the same way that God envisaged for His children in the scriptures.
Until we face this dilemma the land question will remain a hindrance to true liberation.
The Church must take leadership to steer the nation in this dialogue for the sake of the future of our country.
The land CODESA must, in my view, deal with the following questions:
- Should our constitution be changed to allow appropriation of land without compensation?
- How will the government fast-track land distribution and support those who will receive their land back, given the failure to meet its own targets for land redistribution?
- How will the change of policy on land be balanced with the needs for nation building, reconciliation and economic freedom?
We cannot be blind to the collapse of social cohesion and any solutions that do not think ahead will result in the disaster that the 1994 settlement sought to avoid after centuries of conflict through colonialism and apartheid
May the good Lord guide us as we grapple with one of the most fundamental questions facing our nation.
Dear Author,
Are you suggesting in terms of “appropriation of land without compensation” that land should be taken from white people and given to others?
So when peaceful means failed, one now resorts to violence, and you condone this violence needed to execute this so called reversal of land ownership?
Dealing with this issue is a complex one because “WE ALL CAME FROM THE NORTH” right? – Brown people (SAN) which is the first people group should then have first rights over all land in SA. How far do you want to go back? Does not Psalm 24:1 say that “the EARTH IS THE LORDS”.
Would God be pleased with more bloodshed? If I’m not mistaken, does the Government not own approx 51% of all land in SA? Pride and greed is the main culprit that is killing our nation.
In my personal opinion – white people have been sent (BY GOD) to the southern tip of Africa, and badly missed their calling in some ways, BUT we are not colonists as colonists represent the nation of origin. We are South Africans, and we should be embraced as that. Stop speaking about “our people” as to bring further race divide. Stop differentiating between black and white as a starter.
This topic of “appropriation of land without compensation” is so easily accepted without realising the repercussions it would have on every South African.
Thinking that it would go bad only for short period then good is a lie from the enemy…look at Zimbabwe, Cuba or Venezela. Repentance & Forgiveness is Gods pattern!
TRUE LIBERATION is when this nation turns back to God! Then we will hear His counsel clearly.
In no way do I condone what was done in the apartheid era, but allowing apartheid to arise again is the real crime.
You also fail to mention the many projects meant to uplift black farmers but failed so dismally.
Government has failed the people, not the lack of willingness from white people to help.
Land can only be held onto if we walk in Gods ways. Land taken through violence will only add to the sin of the new occupant.
Why have our Government not spend billions on education and basic serices??? 23 years waisted! Now we want radical transformation, as if that will lift the burden…SIN NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH ON A NATIONAL LEVEL.
The ANC government has acquired a great deal of land, but failed to give transfer to individuals, as well as adequately training those to farm and produce economically.Even those who genuinely wish to farm are refused transfer.Billions have been squandered by corrupt schemes that have enriched some,while failing dismally. Farming is a business requiring diverse knowledge to succeed. If South Africa follows the route of Zimbabwe,our nation will implode, and eventually starve through lack of food.ALL if not most of white South African farmers are willing to mentor and help genuine aspiring farmers of any race to succeed. Land must not be used as a political issue to retain or achieve power – if this issue is pursued in such a vein,it will never succeed,and will cause much heartache and suffering.ALL South Africans must be logical and far-seeing about a very real threat to our future existence.Several private concerns are already helping so-called emerging farmers to get onto sound economic footing. Land used for establishing townships is an entirely different issue. Commercial farm enterprises are expanding in size world-wide in order to survive economically.Sophisticated machines are also replacing human labour.Small subsistence attempts can never survive against such competition unless they involve niche markets.
Most people do not need “land”, implying “farm-land”, nor do they even want it. Most people, especially the younger folk, have no ambition to own a few cows or goats, or plant mielies. They want a house to own and live in, and a job or a business. Christians need to have discernment – there is a huge difference between wanting to take land from commercial farmers who have the skill and ability to feed the nation (and other nations) and give it to cronies with no farming knowledge to ruin it, as in Zimbabwe, or splitting it into subsistence small-holdings as was tried so unsuccessfully in other communist countries, causing mass starvation; and property ownership, where you can work hard and honestly to get ownership of your house, and can then use that ownership to leverage loans for a small business in order to uplift yourself and your family.